Why these definitions are short
Most glossary entries elsewhere either restate the acronym or reproduce a paragraph of legislation. Neither helps when you are halfway through a customs form and need to know what a field means.
These start with the answer, in the words a seller would use, and only then explain where it matters and what it is commonly confused with.
The five confusions that cost the most money
Definitions are cheap; the expensive part is two terms that look alike and settle different things. These five come up again and again.
OSS and IOSS. One covers goods already inside the Union moving to a consumer in another member state; the other covers goods arriving from outside it, in consignments up to 150 €. Separate schemes, separate registrations — see the VAT set.
EXW and FCA. Both look like “the buyer arranges everything”. Under FCA the seller still clears the goods for export; under EXW nobody does, and a foreign buyer often cannot — see the Incoterms set.
DAP and DDP. One letter, and it decides who pays import duty and VAT. Under DDP that is the seller, who usually cannot reclaim the import VAT in the buyer’s country — see the Incoterms set.
HS, CN and TARIC. Not three codes but three lengths of one: six digits worldwide, eight for EU export and statistics, ten for EU import — see the customs set.
Volumetric and chargeable weight. The first is a calculation from the dimensions; the second is what the carrier bills, and it is the larger of that and the scale — see the shipping set.